🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare that with what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would still be a better and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.